I wrote this letter to the editor of the Hazleton-Pa., newsppaper yesterday. The proposed cargo airport would destroy at least 5,000 acres of Pennsylvania forest while enriching the pockets of a few select bidness leaders.
1
Letter to the editor 27 June 2008
The Standard-Speaker
Hazleton PA 18201
Editor:
This proposed cargo airport would not have made much sense 30 years ago, and today it amounts to little else — a millions-of-dollars boondoggle to be paid for by taxpayers. The nation is running out of petroleum and its byproducts, including automobile gasoline, and here’s the Hazleton area daydreaming of yet another mindless tool to use up gasoline while also wrecking thousands of acres of Pennsylvania forest. (The powers-that-be would win a lot more public opinion poll votes if they simply transferred ownership of the land to the Pennsylvania Game Commission, or at very least, put a conservation easement on the property. Now that would create a real community asset).
The New York Times a few days ago featured a lengthy article noting how Americans are fleeing suburbia and their trophy homes of three- and four-car garages for urban homes in order to cut back on their automobile and living expenses. But this notion seems to have flown by some folks around here.
Construction of the airport would not only cost us taxpayers a heck of a lot of money, but would also involve enormous transformations in the very landscape that God bequeathed us, including the filling of a huge gorge. Some contractor would make a big bundle, in the many gazillions of dollars range, just to move millions of cubic yards of earth around and get the remaining bare dirt ready for paving into a runway. And the Catawissa Creek would be transformed from a scenic waterway into a storm water runoff zoo.
And while spending money for this make-work project, we taxpayers would get a mere pittance to help our communities and neighborhoods become friendlier to walkers, bicyclists and others who don’t relish the idea of spending more to keep their family cars fueled up.
So, here we are at another crossroads. Do we turn left and destroy another landscape, or turn right and do the best thing?
Recent Comments